I saw a story on the TV news this morning.
In conjunction with Earth Day, a guy at Channel 2 is going to try to ride a bike exclusively for his transportation, for 30 days.
The website story - or his (Michael Calcagno) blog notes - can be seen HERE.
30 days without wheels? Hey - bikes have wheels! Just not quite so many.
He says he got his "bicycle iPhone mount" installed yesterday. HUH? That sounds like trouble a-brewin' to me!
I posted a couple comments to Michael, following his story. (I hope he can go the whole 30 days... and that he enjoys the transition so much that he just keeps on going!)
Tireless advocate for the most efficient form of
human transportation ever devised - bicycles!
Friday, April 23, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Earth Day #40!
Happy Earth Day, everybody! Do something nice for our Mother - I'd suggest flowers. (She likes chocolate, but she's getting pretty, uh, um... ahem... round...)
The organizers of the first Earth Day,
back in 1970, were skeptical that our planet would still be hosting life forms by 40 years later. (And they're probably taking credit, since we made it after all.)
Steve Cotton, of the national Earth Day staff (nice gig!): "Environment is the whole system – and the whole system is screwed up. Poverty, racism, imperialism – the whole environment needs changing."
Kenneth Watt, professor of zoology at UC Davis: "... crude oil will be gone in between 24 and 32 years ... at the moment when I say that we’re moving into an ice age, most people say, 'Hah. That types him – you know, he’s nuts.' But ten years from now, things will be weird enough that people will be saying, 'By God, so that’s why it’s snowing in May!'"
Thank goodness that predicted Ice Age didn't materialize!!
Perhaps Mother Earth is more resilient than we give her credit for.
But don't get me wrong - I'm TOTALLY in favor of minimizing our impact on the planet. Ideally it should be something we keep in mind 365 days, and not just one, each year. I'm trying to tread lightly.
Previous Earth Day commentary: 2007, 2008, 2009.
About the illustration: Hopefully you're not offended. I did a web search for pictures of "Mother Earth," and this one was on the AmericanNeoPaganism website.
The organizers of the first Earth Day,
back in 1970, were skeptical that our planet would still be hosting life forms by 40 years later. (And they're probably taking credit, since we made it after all.)Steve Cotton, of the national Earth Day staff (nice gig!): "Environment is the whole system – and the whole system is screwed up. Poverty, racism, imperialism – the whole environment needs changing."
Kenneth Watt, professor of zoology at UC Davis: "... crude oil will be gone in between 24 and 32 years ... at the moment when I say that we’re moving into an ice age, most people say, 'Hah. That types him – you know, he’s nuts.' But ten years from now, things will be weird enough that people will be saying, 'By God, so that’s why it’s snowing in May!'"
Thank goodness that predicted Ice Age didn't materialize!!
Perhaps Mother Earth is more resilient than we give her credit for.
But don't get me wrong - I'm TOTALLY in favor of minimizing our impact on the planet. Ideally it should be something we keep in mind 365 days, and not just one, each year. I'm trying to tread lightly.
Previous Earth Day commentary: 2007, 2008, 2009.
About the illustration: Hopefully you're not offended. I did a web search for pictures of "Mother Earth," and this one was on the AmericanNeoPaganism website.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Fair-weather cycling upon us?
What a difference a week makes!
Today I counted 23 bicycles in the office bike-parking room! In mid-to-late April!
I'm sure it helps that the morning temperature was in the high 40s and highs near 80 are predicted for the day. Yep, even the lightweights can do it on a day like this!
I don't know the exact number of people who work in my building, but that could be close to 5% of the building population, who arrived via 2-wheeler. Very awesome.
Today I counted 23 bicycles in the office bike-parking room! In mid-to-late April!
I'm sure it helps that the morning temperature was in the high 40s and highs near 80 are predicted for the day. Yep, even the lightweights can do it on a day like this!
I don't know the exact number of people who work in my building, but that could be close to 5% of the building population, who arrived via 2-wheeler. Very awesome.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Driving cost up; cycling cost steady
There is much unrest across the Fruited Plain, as gas prices are suddenly going up sharply. (It's over $3 in Boise for the first time in several years; significantly more in lots of places. Over $9 in the UK! Ouch!)
Drivers are moaning, "How can this be? Doesn't Exxon know we're still in a recession?" One of the Idaho candidates for governor even asked the state Attorney General to investigate the apparent gouging. Reviving fond memories of an earlier AG who would occasionally threaten to investigate... and the price would drop a few cents for a couple weeks, then edge back up.
You drivers, I can explain how this can be.
If you're in traffic, take a look around. Perhaps you are surrounded by fellow motorists. Each is paying the same $3 for gas as you are. Each is contributing to the demand. That demand causes the price to settle at a level where the oil companies and vendors can make a profit. If demand goes up, the price will follow. If demand drops way off... guess what? The price will likely follow.
Meanwhile, every time there's a story suggesting that more people are choosing bicycles or mass transit to get around, some folks whine that this country is becoming more "third world," while China and India are becoming more like us. Where's the justice?!!
An "inconvenient truth" is that indeed, auto usage is up significantly in other places. And all those foreigners are putting a strain on the supply/demand curve, too. If Exxon can sell gas for $6 in China or India, why would they sell it to Americans for $1.50? They're not running a charity, ya know.
My advice?
Combine trips. Eliminate trips. Use a bike, or perhaps a bus, for transportation. Carpool. If you need to drive a couple blocks for a half-gallon of milk, maybe you deserve to be paying $3 or $4 for gas. Reduce your contribution to the worldwide demand for fuel!
It may be a little "third world" to ride a bike or take the bus... but at least ValleyRide still won't let people bring their chickens and goats onboard...
(If anybody has a right to complain about expensive gas, it would be me! And other folks who do minimal driving. We don't use very much, yet your insatiable appetite for the stuff makes the price to go up for us too, on those rare occasions when we need to buy a tankful.)
If the water don't rise, I'll be signing off for a week, and buying some of that precious gas. Planning on throwin' my leg over the Iron Steed and heading south for a few days of ridin' and gas-buyin' and sightseein'. (Anticipated highlights: US50 through Nevada, "America's Loneliest Highway," Death Valley wildflower bloom, Zion Nat'l Park, Bryce Canyon Nat'l Park.) Hasta la vista, baby.
Drivers are moaning, "How can this be? Doesn't Exxon know we're still in a recession?" One of the Idaho candidates for governor even asked the state Attorney General to investigate the apparent gouging. Reviving fond memories of an earlier AG who would occasionally threaten to investigate... and the price would drop a few cents for a couple weeks, then edge back up.
You drivers, I can explain how this can be.
If you're in traffic, take a look around. Perhaps you are surrounded by fellow motorists. Each is paying the same $3 for gas as you are. Each is contributing to the demand. That demand causes the price to settle at a level where the oil companies and vendors can make a profit. If demand goes up, the price will follow. If demand drops way off... guess what? The price will likely follow.
Meanwhile, every time there's a story suggesting that more people are choosing bicycles or mass transit to get around, some folks whine that this country is becoming more "third world," while China and India are becoming more like us. Where's the justice?!!
An "inconvenient truth" is that indeed, auto usage is up significantly in other places. And all those foreigners are putting a strain on the supply/demand curve, too. If Exxon can sell gas for $6 in China or India, why would they sell it to Americans for $1.50? They're not running a charity, ya know.
My advice?
Combine trips. Eliminate trips. Use a bike, or perhaps a bus, for transportation. Carpool. If you need to drive a couple blocks for a half-gallon of milk, maybe you deserve to be paying $3 or $4 for gas. Reduce your contribution to the worldwide demand for fuel!
It may be a little "third world" to ride a bike or take the bus... but at least ValleyRide still won't let people bring their chickens and goats onboard...
(If anybody has a right to complain about expensive gas, it would be me! And other folks who do minimal driving. We don't use very much, yet your insatiable appetite for the stuff makes the price to go up for us too, on those rare occasions when we need to buy a tankful.)
If the water don't rise, I'll be signing off for a week, and buying some of that precious gas. Planning on throwin' my leg over the Iron Steed and heading south for a few days of ridin' and gas-buyin' and sightseein'. (Anticipated highlights: US50 through Nevada, "America's Loneliest Highway," Death Valley wildflower bloom, Zion Nat'l Park, Bryce Canyon Nat'l Park.) Hasta la vista, baby.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
We're Number 32!
For what it's worth, Bicycling Magazine has released its new list of America's Top 50 Bike-Friendly Cities.
Minneapolis, with "a thriving bike community, 210 miles of on- and off-street bicycle facilities, plus indoor bike parking and other cycling-friendly facilities," stole the #1 spot away from perennial Portland.
Boise, with the famous Idaho "stop as yield law," took number 32.
How do you judge "bike friendly"?
Friendly means "showing kindly interest and goodwill; not hostile." Or so says Webster.
Bicycling says it means "segregated bike lanes, municipal bike racks and bike boulevards ... a vibrant and diverse bike culture, and it must have smart, savvy bike shops."
I prefer Webster's. I'd trade my bike lanes and bike racks any day, for fellow citizens who are not hostile, and who are kindly interested! Of course, the harsh reality is that cyclists must deserve non-hostile, kindly-interested citizens; nobody has a right to friendliness. And 'most every day I see people on bicycles, in public places, who seem to be doing their best to alienate non-cyclists. It's a shame.
The best thing Boise cyclists can do to enjoy a truly bike-friendly community is KNOW AND FOLLOW THE LAWS. Ride legally, visibly and predictably, and you'll be an ambassador for goodwill and non-hostility.
Bicycling has a list of 8 "innovative bicycle facilities" for reader consideration. They're pretty good ideas, all right, but facilities and friendly don't necessarily go hand-in-hand.
Minneapolis, with "a thriving bike community, 210 miles of on- and off-street bicycle facilities, plus indoor bike parking and other cycling-friendly facilities," stole the #1 spot away from perennial Portland.
Boise, with the famous Idaho "stop as yield law," took number 32.
How do you judge "bike friendly"?
Friendly means "showing kindly interest and goodwill; not hostile." Or so says Webster.
Bicycling says it means "segregated bike lanes, municipal bike racks and bike boulevards ... a vibrant and diverse bike culture, and it must have smart, savvy bike shops."
I prefer Webster's. I'd trade my bike lanes and bike racks any day, for fellow citizens who are not hostile, and who are kindly interested! Of course, the harsh reality is that cyclists must deserve non-hostile, kindly-interested citizens; nobody has a right to friendliness. And 'most every day I see people on bicycles, in public places, who seem to be doing their best to alienate non-cyclists. It's a shame.
The best thing Boise cyclists can do to enjoy a truly bike-friendly community is KNOW AND FOLLOW THE LAWS. Ride legally, visibly and predictably, and you'll be an ambassador for goodwill and non-hostility.
Bicycling has a list of 8 "innovative bicycle facilities" for reader consideration. They're pretty good ideas, all right, but facilities and friendly don't necessarily go hand-in-hand.
Pedal-powered jailhouse television
"Sheriff Joe" Arpaio, down there in Maricopa County (Phoenix) has become an icon for believers in "tough on crime." From his tent accommodations, to pink underwear, to no coffee (can't the ACLU do something?!?), to bologna-sammich lunches, his philosophy is that prison should be a place you want to avoid! (I like the notion, but don't know whether Arpaio's criminal-recidivism rate is better than that of all those weenie milquetoast/liberal sheriffs scattered across the Fruited Plain or not.)
Sheriff Joe's latest notion has particular appeal to this bike rider.
Noticing that many of his guests are struggling with overweight issues, he has set up stationary bicycles that spin generators, which in turn provide power to television sets. You wanna watch TV? Get to pedalin'!!
Personally, I'm glad not to be in Sheriff Joe's lockup. Maybe I could handle the pink underpants, but I don't like stationary bikes at all! However, like he says, "This gives them a reason to get moving and a way to burn up to 500 calories an hour." No word on whether the pedalers get two bologna sammiches, instead of just one.
Story HERE.
Sheriff Joe's latest notion has particular appeal to this bike rider.
Noticing that many of his guests are struggling with overweight issues, he has set up stationary bicycles that spin generators, which in turn provide power to television sets. You wanna watch TV? Get to pedalin'!!
Personally, I'm glad not to be in Sheriff Joe's lockup. Maybe I could handle the pink underpants, but I don't like stationary bikes at all! However, like he says, "This gives them a reason to get moving and a way to burn up to 500 calories an hour." No word on whether the pedalers get two bologna sammiches, instead of just one.
Story HERE.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Spring Break on Campus
I've been enjoying a refreshing route change on my way home from the office this week, riding across the Boise State University campus. (The home of the world-famous blue turf, over at Bronco Stadium.)
The route is almost exactly the same distance as my normal route (4 miles roughly), and the scenery is arguably better. I ride through downtown (in a bike lane mostly), then through a lovely riverside city park (Julia Davis) and over a footbridge to the campus. Up a gentle hill, and homeward.
Under normal circumstances, I generally avoid the route... because of the on-campus foot traffic. At the time I'm normally headed home (5:15, give or take), pedestrians are thick. And they'd normally be fine; I can easily slow to comparable speed and mesh in a harmonious fashion.
EXCEPT WITH THE CELLPHONE PEOPLE. I swear... the minute class is out, at least 80% of those college kids are punchin' the buttons on those phones and yammering away. And a meaningful percentage of them are wandering bovine-like, with no apparent direction or destination, and with a bovine-like expression on their faces. Mooooo!
If you doubt that using a phone has a negative impact on the navigational skills of at least some people... take a walk on the Wild Side, between classes on campus. (I bet you'd see people walking into posts, bumping into each other, etc.)
[It doesn't seem to affect everybody that way. Some folks are talking, and heading in a definite direction, and even paying attention to their surroundings, all at the same time. Perhaps an aptitude test should be administered... because I'm not comfortable with the notion of the cellphone Cow People behind the wheels of their cars.]
The route is almost exactly the same distance as my normal route (4 miles roughly), and the scenery is arguably better. I ride through downtown (in a bike lane mostly), then through a lovely riverside city park (Julia Davis) and over a footbridge to the campus. Up a gentle hill, and homeward.
Under normal circumstances, I generally avoid the route... because of the on-campus foot traffic. At the time I'm normally headed home (5:15, give or take), pedestrians are thick. And they'd normally be fine; I can easily slow to comparable speed and mesh in a harmonious fashion.
EXCEPT WITH THE CELLPHONE PEOPLE. I swear... the minute class is out, at least 80% of those college kids are punchin' the buttons on those phones and yammering away. And a meaningful percentage of them are wandering bovine-like, with no apparent direction or destination, and with a bovine-like expression on their faces. Mooooo!
If you doubt that using a phone has a negative impact on the navigational skills of at least some people... take a walk on the Wild Side, between classes on campus. (I bet you'd see people walking into posts, bumping into each other, etc.)
[It doesn't seem to affect everybody that way. Some folks are talking, and heading in a definite direction, and even paying attention to their surroundings, all at the same time. Perhaps an aptitude test should be administered... because I'm not comfortable with the notion of the cellphone Cow People behind the wheels of their cars.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)