This is a letter I sent to Boise's Mayor, City Council, and Parks Department.
Dear City
Administrators:
IT'S QUIZ
TIME!
Below are two photos I recently snapped, along
bike/pedestrian paths in our area. One
was taken in Boise – a city
desiring to be known for being "bike friendly," and succeeding at
that effort in many ways. (What with our
ACHD "Bronze Level" recognition by the Bike League, etc.) The other was taken in Garden City – a
community that has a reputation for being somewhat stand-offish and
"unfriendly" when it comes to bicycles on public pathways. See if you can guess which sign is in which
city:
If you guessed that "bikes yield" in Boise
and "no bicycles" in Garden City, you'd be WRONG!
There aren't many "no bicycles"
signs in Boise, but I've seen them
in two recent development projects – a disturbing trend?
The photo was taken in the new Williams Park,
at the east end of town, and there are also "no bicycles" signs at
the Hyatt Hidden Lakes Reserve at the west end of town.
In fact, the Hyatt "rules" state,
"Dogs, bicycles and all water activities are prohibited in the
preserve."
Why the antipathy towards bicycles? Is there something inherently destructive or
undesirable about bicycles and their riders?
I can understand a rule prohibiting dogs – at least unleashed dogs. And a prohibition on water
"activities" in wetland habitat areas certainly makes sense. But why a blanket prohibition on bicycles??
As a lifelong Boise
resident and cycling advocate, I'm unhappy that cyclists are "presumed
guilty with no opportunity to demonstrate innocence."
Are there some irresponsible cyclists that crowd our
paths? Absolutely! But you don't prohibit all motorists from
using the roads because a few of them drive drunk! (And I might add, there are plenty of
irresponsible pedestrians, roller-bladers, dog-walkers, etc. crowding the paths
as well.)
On many days I ride through Williams Park, or ride past the
Hyatt Reserve, without seeing another soul.
Why do you arbitrarily prohibit me from trying a different path? I've never run over a duck or goose in my
life! (I ran over a cat once, with my
bicycle on a city street, but it was clearly the cat's fault!) If my granddaughter and I are riding the Greenbelt
in Williams Park, and want to use the restroom or fill water bottles, we have
to get off and walk our bikes down an often-empty sidewalk. Makes NO sense!
Why not use the new facilities as an educational
opportunity? Frankly, I quite like those
Garden City "Shared Path / Bikes Yield" signs – you should post them
all up and down the Greenbelt! Maybe with a "Speed Limit 15mph" in
addition.
I do most of my riding on city streets. On those occasions when I take to the Greenbelt,
I sincerely try to follow the rules, and resent cyclists who either are unaware
of the rules or have no intention of following them. But don't penalize all of us on account of
the scofflaws!
Sincerely,
Steve Hulme
Lifelong Boise Citizen, Taxpayer, Voter
UPDATE!
I got a very informative email response from an employee of the Parks & Recreation department, who was involved in the development of both facilities mentioned.
I was informed that both of those facilities had pre-existing conditions on them, that excluded bicycles and certain other user categories. The city had no choice in the matter. In the case of the Hyatt Reserve, "One of the main focuses was to minimize the disturbance to the water fowl and wildlife." I take minor issue with that... I replied, "I have ongoing confusion about how a bicycle rolling along a path (at a
reasonable speed) could possibly create any more "disturbance" to
wildlife than an equivalent number of pedestrians crunching along the
path."
But the response is encouraging - the City hasn't adopted a policy of excluding bicyclists from newly-developed facilities, overall.
.
